Critical Digital Pedagogy Syllabus

Items

• Rhetorical code studies: Discovering arguments in and around code

  Brock, Kevin. Rhetorical code studies: Discovering arguments in and around code. University of Michigan Press, 2019.

• Race as technology

  Coleman, Beth. "Race as technology." Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 24.1 (70) (2009): 177-207.

• Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination.

  Benjamin, Ruha. "Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination." Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2 (2016): 145-156.

• Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code

  Benjamin, Ruha. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

• Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work

  Rob Kitchin and Tracey Lauriault. (2014). "Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work." https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a0bf/2567e8ae39538719686bb6cfab548855e7c9.pdf

• Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data

  Thatcher J, O’Sullivan D, Mahmoudi D. Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2016 Dec;34(6):990-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633195

• Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon

  Boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. "Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon." Information, communication & society 15.5 (2012): 662-679.

• Good Data

  Daly, Angela, Monique Mann, and S. Kate Devitt. Good Data. Lulu. com, 2019.

• Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age

  Eubanks, Virginia. Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age. MIT Press, 2012.

• Data and discrimination: Collected essays.

  Gangadharan, Seeta Pena, Virginia Eubanks, and Solon Barocas. "Data and discrimination: Collected essays." Open Technology (2014).

• Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide

  Metcalf, Jacob, and Kate Crawford. "Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide." Big Data & Society 3.1 (2016): 2053951716650211.

• What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally

  Taylor, Linnet. "What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally." Big Data & Society 4.2 (2017): 2053951717736335.

• Feminist data visualization.

  D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. "Feminist data visualization." Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH), Baltimore. IEEE. 2016.

• Speculative visualization: A new rhetoric for communicating public concerns.

  Kim, Tanyoung, and Carl DiSalvo. "Speculative visualization: A new rhetoric for communicating public concerns." In Proceedings of the Design Research Society (DRS) international conference design & complexity. 2010.

• #transform (ing) DH Writing and Research: An Autoethnography of Digital Humanities and Feminist Ethics.

  Bailey, Moya. "#transform (ing) DH Writing and Research: An Autoethnography of Digital Humanities and Feminist Ethics." DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 9.2 (2015).

• Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities.

  Christof Schöch. Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2013, 2 (3), pp.2-13. Ffhal-00920254f

• The remaking of reading: Data mining and the digital humanities.

  Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. "The remaking of reading: Data mining and the digital humanities." The National Science Foundation Symposium on Next Generation of Data Mining and Cyber-Enabled Discovery for Innovation, Baltimore, MD. Vol. 134. 2007.

• Can digital humanities mean transformative critique?

  Lothian, Alexis, and Amanda Phillips. "Can digital humanities mean transformative critique?." Journal of E-Media Studies 3.1 (2013): 1-25.

• From Transformative Works to# transformDH: Digital Humanities as (Critical) Fandom

  Lothian, Alexis. "From Transformative Works to# transformDH: Digital Humanities as (Critical) Fandom." American Quarterly 70.3 (2018): 371-393.

• Data Feminism

  D'Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. Data Feminism. MIT Press, 2020.

• Visualizing junk: Big data visualizations and the need for feminist data studies

  Hill, Rosemary Lucy, Helen Kennedy, and Ysabel Gerrard. "Visualizing junk: Big data visualizations and the need for feminist data studies." Journal of Communication Inquiry 40.4 (2016): 331-350.

• Feminist data studies: using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research.

  Leurs, Koen. "Feminist data studies: using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research." Feminist Review 115.1 (2017): 130-154.

• On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small.

  Welles, Brooke Foucault. "On minorities and outliers: The case for making Big Data small." Big Data & Society 1.1 (2014): 2053951714540613.

• The poetics of design fiction.

  Markussen, Thomas, and Eva Knutz. "The poetics of design fiction." Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 2013.

• Governing data and data for governance: the everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty

  Smith, D. E. (2016). “Governing data and data for governance: the everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty,” Ch. 7 in Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda, 117-138. https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/stable/j.ctt1q1crgf.14.

• Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda

  Kukutai, Tahu, and John Taylor, eds. Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Vol. 38. Anu Press, 2016.

• Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia

  Yap, L. M. M., & Yu, E. (2016). “Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia,” Ch. 13 in In Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. ANU Press. https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/stable/j.ctt1q1crgf.20

• Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon.

  Boyd, Danah, and Kate Crawford. "Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon." Information, communication & society 15.5 (2012): 662-679.

• What does a critical data studies look like, and why do we care? Seven points for a critical approach to ‘big data’.

  Dalton, Craig, and Jim Thatcher. "What does a critical data studies look like, and why do we care? Seven points for a critical approach to ‘big data’." Society and Space 29 (2014).

• A case for critical data studies in Library and Information Studies

  Oliphant, Tami. "A case for critical data studies in Library and Information Studies." Harvard Business Review 70 (2012).

• Size matters to lesbians, too: Queer feminist interventions into the scale of big data.

  Gieseking, Jen Jack. "Size matters to lesbians, too: Queer feminist interventions into the scale of big data." The Professional Geographer 70.1 (2018): 150-156.

• Boxes of our own creation: A trans data collection wo/manifesto.

  Harrison-Quintana, Jack, Jaime M. Grant, and Ignacio G. Rivera. "Boxes of our own creation: A trans data collection wo/manifesto." Transgender Studies Quarterly 2.1 (2015): 166-174.

• Queer OS.

  Keeling, Kara. "Queer OS." Cinema Journal 53.2 (2014): 152-157.

• Transcoding Sexuality: Computational Performativity and Queer Code Practices.

  Jackson, Gerald Stephen. "Transcoding Sexuality: Computational Performativity and Queer Code Practices." QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking 4.2 (2017): 1-25.

• Black Data

  McGlotten, Shaka. 2016. “Black Data.” In No Tea, No Shade: New Writings in Black Queer Studies, edited by E. Patrick Johnson. Durham: Duke University Press.

• Countermapping Data Science.

  Dalton, Craig and Tim Stalman. (2018). Countermapping Data Science. Canadian Geographer 2018, 62(1): 93-101.

• Creative Data Literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots

  Catherine D’Ignazio. 2017. Creative Data Literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots, Information Design Journal 23(1), 6–18.

• Data Humanism

  Data Humanism - http://giorgialupi.com/data-humanism-my-manifesto-for-a-new-data-wold

• FemTechNet: A Collective Statement on Teaching and Learning Race, Feminism, and Technology.

  FemTechNet Collective. "FemTechNet: A Collective Statement on Teaching and Learning Race, Feminism, and Technology." Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 39.1 (2018): 24-41.

• Feminist Data Manifesto-No

  “Feminist Data Manifesto-No” - https://www.manifestno.com/

• A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s.

  Haraway, Donna. "A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s." The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory (1994): 82-115.

• Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’

  Michael, Mike, and Deborah Lupton. "Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’." Public Understanding of Science 25.1 (2016): 104-116.

• Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS)

  “Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS)” - https://www.stateofopendata.od4d.net/chapters/issues/indigenous-data.html

• The Good Data Project

  “The Good Data Project” https://networkcultures.org/blog/2019/01/11/principles-of-good-data/

• The Technium: Data Manifesto

  The Technium: Data Manifesto - https://kk.org/thetechnium/data-manifesto/

• Critical technocultural discourse analysis

  Brock, André. "Critical technocultural discourse analysis." New Media & Society 20.3 (2018): 1012-1030.

• Digital sociologies

  Daniels, Jessie, and Karen Gregory, eds. Digital sociologies. Policy Press, 2016.

• Methods of critical discourse studies

  Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage, 2015.

• Intersecting Oppressions and Online Communities

  Gray, Kishonna. 2012. “Intersecting Oppressions and Online Communities.” Information, Communication and Society 15, no. 3: 411-428.

• The Politics of ‘Platforms’.

  Gillespie, Tarleton. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444809342738